FAMOUS GOD-HATING ILLUMINATI MEMBER RICHARD DAWKIN SAYS "I CAN MATE WITH A CHIMPANZEE!" ILLUMINATI BESTIALITY EXPOSED!

General philosophy message board for Discussion and debate on other philosophical issues not directly related to veganism. Metaphysics, religion, theist vs. atheist debates, politics, general science discussion, etc.
User avatar
Blizzy
Junior Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:19 pm
Religion: Christian
Diet: Vegan

FAMOUS GOD-HATING ILLUMINATI MEMBER RICHARD DAWKIN SAYS "I CAN MATE WITH A CHIMPANZEE!" ILLUMINATI BESTIALITY EXPOSED!

Post by Blizzy » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:48 pm

"Slippery slope is a phallacy" Yeah right! Gay Marriage is legalized and lo and behold, RICHARD DAWKIN is pushing for bestiality, and he's not the only one! Peter Singer, another famous Atheist, has supported it (along with Abortion, Infanticide and Necrophillia!) First it was inter-racial marriage, then the gays, then polygamy, currently the incest rights movement is going on, but Dawkin and Singer are already pushing for Bestiality, along with thousands of other Illuminati Members. If you are a Vegan and you condone this then you are a hypocrite! When is raping animals okay when killing them is not? Think of the children! Would you want your daughter marrying a guinea pig, iguana, goldfish, dead person or child? NO?!? So why would you let her marry a Cracker, Woman, Several People, or her Brother? There is hardly any difference between Miscegenation, Homosexuality, Polygamy and Incest to Bestiality, Pedophillia and Necrophillia. The Illuminati condone all 8¬!! The Bible says: "“Anyone who has sexual relations with an animal must be put to death.” - Exodus 22:19

Here is the video where Dawkin made the offending remark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHi7exfSFrI

User avatar
bobo0100
Senior Member
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:41 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)
Diet: Vegan
Location: Australia, NT

Post by bobo0100 » Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:00 pm

Really Blizzy? that quote wasn't taken out of context at all (obvious sarcasm)! Dawkin's was explaining speciation, not a desire to have sex with a chimp. Feel free to jump in if I get anything wrong, but this is my understanding of speciation. (A) A chimp, is able to produce offspring with (B) a transitional form between humans and chimps. (C) Another transitional form between a chimp and a human Is able to produce offspring with (B) the previous transitional form, and (D) a human. But (D) a human, is not able to reproduce with (A) a chimp, or (B) an early transitional form, Because specialisation has occurred.
To this please don't respond that evolution is not true, because his quote must be understood within the context of his world view.

On to Peter Singer. It is true that he does not find bestiality to be immoral. This must be understood again within the context of his world view which for the majority of his career has been Preference Utilitarianism. Which I have explained in many other topics. Peter's statements on the topic essentially come down to (not a direct quote) 'The differences in the reproductive systems of humans and animals do not always count as differences that would make ether party experience displeasure drying sex." or (not a quote again) "There does not seem to be any evidence that animals experience displeasure during acts of Bestiality." If you wish to claim that it is morally objectionable from a utilitarian perspective, than the burden of proof is on you.

Infanticide and abortion are issues he has gone into in far more depth, I would have to say I more or less agree with his views on the topic, as I understand them.

But I have only seen on quote from him about Necrophilia "When asked about the morality of necrophilia (having sexual relations with a corpse) Singer said, “There’s no moral problem with that.”" As you can see this is not an in depth analysis of the morality of necrophilia, but rather a single statement on the topic. I do not think that Singer would condone the legalisation of Necrophilia.
vegan: to exclude—as far as is practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for any purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of humans, animals and the environment.

User avatar
Insert name here
Full Member
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:03 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)
Location: Insert location here.

Post by Insert name here » Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:33 pm

Remeber Bobo, don't feed the trolls.
Insert signature here.

User avatar
bobo0100
Senior Member
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:41 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)
Diet: Vegan
Location: Australia, NT

Post by bobo0100 » Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:36 pm

Insert name here wrote:Remeber Bobo, don't feed the trolls.
Isn't it the case that Blizzy and Dizzy are one in the same? I was wrong about green apples, but I'm sure that this is so in regards to Blizzy.
vegan: to exclude—as far as is practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for any purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of humans, animals and the environment.

User avatar
Blizzy
Junior Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:19 pm
Religion: Christian
Diet: Vegan

Post by Blizzy » Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:00 am

Insert name here wrote:Remeber Bobo, don't feed the trolls.
I am not a troll/

User avatar
Blizzy
Junior Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:19 pm
Religion: Christian
Diet: Vegan

Post by Blizzy » Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:06 am

bobo0100 wrote:Really Blizzy? that quote wasn't taken out of context at all (obvious sarcasm)! Dawkin's was explaining speciation, not a desire to have sex with a chimp. Feel free to jump in if I get anything wrong, but this is my understanding of speciation. (A) A chimp, is able to produce offspring with (B) a transitional form between humans and chimps. (C) Another transitional form between a chimp and a human Is able to produce offspring with (B) the previous transitional form, and (D) a human. But (D) a human, is not able to reproduce with (A) a chimp, or (B) an early transitional form, Because specialisation has occurred.
To this please don't respond that evolution is not true, because his quote must be understood within the context of his world view.

On to Peter Singer. It is true that he does not find bestiality to be immoral. This must be understood again within the context of his world view which for the majority of his career has been Preference Utilitarianism. Which I have explained in many other topics. Peter's statements on the topic essentially come down to (not a direct quote) 'The differences in the reproductive systems of humans and animals do not always count as differences that would make ether party experience displeasure drying sex." or (not a quote again) "There does not seem to be any evidence that animals experience displeasure during acts of Bestiality." If you wish to claim that it is morally objectionable from a utilitarian perspective, than the burden of proof is on you.

Infanticide and abortion are issues he has gone into in far more depth, I would have to say I more or less agree with his views on the topic, as I understand them.

But I have only seen on quote from him about Necrophilia "When asked about the morality of necrophilia (having sexual relations with a corpse) Singer said, “There’s no moral problem with that.”" As you can see this is not an in depth analysis of the morality of necrophilia, but rather a single statement on the topic. I do not think that Singer would condone the legalisation of Necrophilia.
Oh really? There was footage of him mating with a chimpanzee ew. And Peter Singer is a cunt enough said, now you can go back to sexing up monkies.

User avatar
bobo0100
Senior Member
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:41 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)
Diet: Vegan
Location: Australia, NT

Post by bobo0100 » Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:43 am

Okay, I'm convinced you are a troll, and will not be replying to any of your comments again.
vegan: to exclude—as far as is practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for any purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of humans, animals and the environment.

User avatar
Blizzy
Junior Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:19 pm
Religion: Christian
Diet: Vegan

Post by Blizzy » Thu Nov 05, 2015 1:04 pm

bobo0100 wrote:Okay, I'm convinced you are a troll, and will not be replying to any of your comments again.
FINE YOU'LL BE SORRY WHEN YOUR IN HELL YOU MONKEY FUCKER!

yuno44907
Junior Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:47 am
Religion: Other
Diet: Meat-Eater

Post by yuno44907 » Fri Nov 06, 2015 5:50 pm

You cant mate with a chimp. They are insane and weird and they can easily kill and eat you. Smart animals are very very dangerous. Thats why most gruesome animals are humans. Every woman dont want to meet with a stranger in jungle. In a desserted place a man can do everything to you. And most people brutally murder and rape you. Every year we found many corpses.

So dont fuck with chimps. About illuminati they didnt kill all of the muslims and they hate Hitler. Thats why i think illuminati just about money and they dont care about atheist or homosexual people.

You are rude, this computers and internet builded by illuminati. You have to respect and thankful to them. Without illuminati you cant even have a car, they devoloped all of science. Truth is Nicola Tesla wasnt human and people like him built this futuristic world. So if you hate illuminati go live in a village; we following you by connection and phone!!!

User avatar
Blizzy
Junior Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:19 pm
Religion: Christian
Diet: Vegan

Post by Blizzy » Sat Nov 07, 2015 3:14 am

yuno44907 wrote:You cant mate with a chimp. They are insane and weird and they can easily kill and eat you. Smart animals are very very dangerous. Thats why most gruesome animals are humans. Every woman dont want to meet with a stranger in jungle. In a desserted place a man can do everything to you. And most people brutally murder and rape you. Every year we found many corpses.

So dont fuck with chimps. About illuminati they didnt kill all of the muslims and they hate Hitler. Thats why i think illuminati just about money and they dont care about atheist or homosexual people.

You are rude, this computers and internet builded by illuminati. You have to respect and thankful to them. Without illuminati you cant even have a car, they devoloped all of science. Truth is Nicola Tesla wasnt human and people like him built this futuristic world. So if you hate illuminati go live in a village; we following you by connection and phone!!!
I DONT EVEN WANT A COMPUTER BUT NOW THAT I HAD IT I WILL USE IT TO PREACH AGAINST THE ILLUMINATI NIKOLA TESLA SUCKS HE IS WHITE AND HITLER WAS PART OF THE ILLUMINATI HE WAS AN ATHEIST WORKING FOR THE JEWS WHO FAKED THE HOLOCAUST IN ORDER TO GIVE THE ZIONIST KIKES AND EXCUSE TO ATTACK ISRAEL AND STARTED NASA. RICHARD DAWKIN IS PART OF THE ILLUMINATI AND HE SEXES UP CHIMPS. Sorry about the caps-lock, I only just realized it now and it would take a long time to put back in lower-case.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests