My friend believes the moon landing was a hoax

General philosophy message board for Discussion and debate on other philosophical issues not directly related to veganism. Metaphysics, religion, theist vs. atheist debates, politics, general science discussion, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jebus
Master of the Forum
Posts: 2014
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:08 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)
Diet: Vegan

My friend believes the moon landing was a hoax

Post by Jebus » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:07 pm

Jebus wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
Today is 50 years since the moon landing hoax. (being sarcastic)
Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
Agreed! It was a hoax
As was all kinds of other former and current events
Jebus wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
It's amazing how they managed to silence 800000 people for 50 years. The government is good at that kind of shit (still being sarcastic).
Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
They have near total information control...anyone who wanders off the farm too far is quickly labeled
Plenty of whistleblowers, they simply get shoved to the margins
Jebus wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
Do you think man will ever walk on the sun?
Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
LOL!
Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
I believe humans made it to the moon, but perhaps not all the voyages were real 🙂
Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
://youtu.be/h_COQbeaCCE

Hmmmm, any doubts now?


Jebus wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
I am even more (if possible) convinced that the moon landing happened after watching that. For example, why the hell would Collins (who is highly intelligent) say "I don't remember seeing anything" if he had just been part of a hoax? It wouldn't make any sense.

You should have a look at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPj60sy9Cfw
Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
So many assumptions, they talk about the moon dust, but if we’ve never been there, how do we know what is actually in the moon dust and how reflective it is? And he says “according to NASA”, his source is the very organization responsible for faking it if it was faked, this is junk science at best.

Simple questions, IF NASA did create a hoax then how can you bust the myths surrounding said hoax by using "according to our sources at NASA" as a source of technical information regarding reflectivity of moon dust? If we never made it to the moon, then how do they know the exact illumination qualities of moon dust? So the very organization that would have faked it wouldn't fake the reflectivity needed for this little experiment? Mythbusters BUSTED!

Jebus wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
So you mean all moon landings were fake, even the unmanned ones that picked up moon dust?
Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
Question, who took the photo’s of the landings? lololol! How is there a photo of a landing, did the camera crew arrive before?
Jebus wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
Are you serious?

Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
Having moon dust and providing reflectivity data by the same organization trying to quell hoax theories is problematic. Also the myth busters are on Discovery Channel, owned by CBS a company with a clear agenda, certainly not unbiased in protecting the stories, otherwise they would discover real 9/11 truth, the biggest coverup of them all.
Jebus wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
That data doesn't have to come from Nasa. Your only argument would be that all the dust they have made public is fake.

Imagine for a moment the kind of leverage the mythbusters team would have against CBS if they were told to follow a certain agenda. No news (organization) would open themselves up to something like that. It would have made much more sense for them to not touch that story had they been part of the conspiracy.

One simply can't get away with poor experimental design when it's put on tv in front of millions.

Jebus' friend wrote:
Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:10 pm
I disagree, I don’t think you realize how compartmentalized and washed most brains are. Perfect example is 9/11, I can with near zero doubt tell you it didn’t happen the way they say it did, and in fact thousands of pilots and engineers declare its impossible yet the mainstream media is complicit in silencing those voices and declaring the narrative finished. Without a shred of doubt the msm is complicit in a plethora coverups and falsities, in fact most of history is just that. The guys at myth busters don’t need to be in on it, they perhaps are brainwashed themselves to such a degree that within their compartmentalization they prove concepts within a bubble. There are things we know, things we don’t know, and things we don’t know that we don’t know. It’s a virtual certainty most in media don’t even know they are being led like sheep by their Masters. Just a quick look at Freemasonry demonstrates the different degrees of knowledge allowed, meaning those above 33rd degree function in a completely different paradigm that the lower rungs do, and must chuckle from time to time watching the lemmings debate within false narratives. This could be no different, and of course It could be true, I have no real opinion other than a vast distrust of mainstream thought and their media and institutions.

Just explain how the BBC reported LIVE that building 7 had collapsed, and Building 7 was standing in the background of their live feed lol! Leverage is never exercised when dealing with the cartels, they know better than that, and if they try it won’t get any news coverage.
How to become vegan in 4.5 hours:
1.Watch Forks over Knives (Health)
2.Watch Cowspiracy (Environment)
3. Watch Earthlings (Ethics)
Congratulations, unless you are a complete idiot you are now a vegan.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests