Simply consider how they got this video. Some animal rights activists went undercover and got a job at these places, and then smuggled in a camera at some point.kian.zarrin wrote: Some people argue that earthlings show some rare and awful cases of animals treatment and then lie that it is common practice.
These are not hundreds of people taking cameras into these places every day to find these things - they are a small handful of people, working at these places just long enough to get some film before quitting.
It is by no means easy:
http://boingboing.net/2012/03/08/workin ... laugh.html
They are the worst examples from what those people were able to film, but the total amount of film is relatively small. People aren't allowed to bring cameras in, and most workers aren't even supposed to be able to see what goes on, so they have to leave their posts and get let in somewhere they're not supposed to be in order to film it.
These are examples of the worst thing that happened that hour, or that day that they were able to film, and only for what they were able to film, not that year.
There's not an undercover animal activist filming everything that goes on in every slaughterhouse in the world waiting for one bad thing to happen - if these people think that, they give the scope and power of animal advocacy far too much credit. Slaughterhouses and even factory farms are pretty well locked down, this kind of film is by no means easy to come by.
These things are awful, but they are also common, otherwise it would be nearly impossible to catch them on film by an undercover investigator.
In some states, it's even illegal to film in a farm or slaughter house.
Just explain the conditions under which the film is acquired, and ask them if they think there are armies of vegan super spies across the country, working in farms and slaughter houses and filming 24/7 to catch these 'rare' events.kian.zarrin wrote:Unfortunately I found it impossible assess the validity of this claim without going to many different factory farms.
Can anyone help me with to find the answer?
There aren't. The claims are false. Those films represent a small peek into that world, and are only the worst things that happened in that tiny window where they were able to film.
If animal agriculture industries were more open and allowed filming - instead of making laws to put those people who film in prison - then there might be an argument for that. The total volume of undercover film, as it stands, is very low, making those instances of intense cruelty quite substantial and representative of normal occurrences.
As to standard industry practice- this can be looked up online; there are a number of industry papers that cover this in detail, as well as publicly filed patents.
I hope that helps answer your question.