The news in the UK for politics
- Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
- Master of the Forum
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 5:57 am
- Diet: Ostrovegan
- Location: The Matrix
The news in the UK for politics
Yo. David Cameron, the British pig-shagging Prime Minister has gone because for Brexit. Theresa May has taken his place. But do not be fooled. They are one and the same, just like every single Tory parasite which screws over the poor and the NHS. They are scum. Capitalist scum. Theresa May said that Gordon Brown, the former Blairite Prime Minister needed to hold an election as the British people didn't vote him in, but she will not hold an election, because she knows that the British electorate are disenfranchised with politics and will elect Jeremy Corbyn, the true left-wing man, to prime minister and make a socialist UK exist. There is a Labour leadership coup of Blairites who want Jeremy Corbyn to step down as leader because he actually holds on to socialist principles and Keir Hardie's values rather than be capitalist shit like them. They claim Corbyn is an ineffective leader who caused Brexit, however Corbyn made 123 media appearances 6th May-22nd June 2016, more than both Alan Johnson, who was head of Labour remain, and Angela Eagle, the Judas who was plotting the coup. There will be a split in the Labour party between the Socialists and the Blairites. Well good. The Blairites can all fuck off. We don't want them. They are sacrificing our principles on the altar of electability, when they know that Corbyn will win an election anyway. Farage has resigned as leader of UKIP, but he will probably be back soon because he is an attention-seeking racist git. Either that or he will join the Tories as UKIP and the Tories are both the same scum. There is nothing going on with the Liberal Democrats because the three people who are still members of that party don't disagree on much. Tim Farron, their leader since 2015, seems moderately better than Nick Clegg, although this isn't saying much. Weed is still illegal in the UK which is a travesty. What are your thoughts on this as most of you are Americans? Are things any better with Crooked Hillary and Troublesome Trump? Please tell me what you think.
-
- Master in Training
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:34 pm
Re: The news in the UK for politics
I don't know much about UK politics, but my first impression of your new prime minister is positive, as she has flirted with the idea of abolishing human rights. Finally, a Western leader who appears to have a functioning brain and a pair of balls. The primary task of any nation's leader should be to defend its citizens, not to abide by outdated conventions that do little else but provide cover for the enemies of our civilization.
Boris Johnson is going to be an interesting foreign secretary, given that he has already pissed off most of the world with his remarks. I liked his poem about Erdogan, but I'm not sure being a charismatic troll qualifies someone for that position
Boris Johnson is going to be an interesting foreign secretary, given that he has already pissed off most of the world with his remarks. I liked his poem about Erdogan, but I'm not sure being a charismatic troll qualifies someone for that position
- miniboes
- Master of the Forum
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:52 pm
- Diet: Vegan
- Location: Netherlands
Re: The news in the UK for politics
Why in the world would you do that? As in, all human rights? Or just a few?knot wrote:abolishing human rights
"I advocate infinite effort on behalf of very finite goals, for example correcting this guy's grammar."
- David Frum
- David Frum
- Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
- Master of the Forum
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 5:57 am
- Diet: Ostrovegan
- Location: The Matrix
Re: The news in the UK for politics
If Ed Miliband was Prime Minister, we wouldn't be in this mess.
-
- Master in Training
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:34 pm
Re: The news in the UK for politics
Yes, get rid of them or rewrite them. As they function now, I think they pose a great threat because they often translate into rights regardless of consequences or responsibilities. Especially now that Europe is effectively on the cusp of civil war, I think it is very foolish to hand out all these rights to identified enemies. The fact that Saudi Araba is the chair of the U.N. human rights council also says a lot. Given that SA is the most abhorrent place on Earth, this is a pretty clear indication to me the human rights council has nothing to do with upholding universal moral principles, but everything to do with furthering particular economic and political agendas.miniboes wrote:Why in the world would you do that? As in, all human rights? Or just a few?knot wrote:abolishing human rights