General philosophy message board for Discussion and debate on other philosophical issues not directly related to veganism. Metaphysics, religion, theist vs. atheist debates, politics, general science discussion, etc.
EquALLity wrote:
1) i don't know, he just wanted a President to be at his wedding. Hillary Clinton and Trump obviously don't like each other currently. That was back when Trump was just a businessman.
2) She called them super-predators. Like I said, Clinton's super-predator remark was racially charged, but do you really think she's racist? What makes more sense, that's she's actually racist, or that (as a slimy politician) she was willing to use racist language to advance political ideals?
And WTF? She never fought for segregation.
3) Obama and Hillary both support Israel to the same extent, and they both support drone strikes.
4) Obama got more money from Wall Street than Hillary Clinton in 2008. It's bad that she's funded by the banks, but not any more bad than it was for Obama to be, who you apparently love.
5) Maybe a few people have been released, but that's far from a solution.
1) Hillary isn't a President AND SHE NEVER WILL BE!!!
2) If you are slimy enough to use racist rhetoric in order to advance yourself, then you are a racist. What? Is Trump not a racist either? Hillary was a republican in 1963 and she was a strong supporter of Barry Goldwater a staunch segregationist.
3) Obama supports Palestina.
4) First of all, you are a red herring. Second of all, Obama introduced a Wall Street reform and a Glass-Steagall, which Hillary is Still Against.
5) It is more than a few.
1) Bill Clinton was a President, and he's married to Hillary Clinton.
2) You aren't racist just because you're willing to use racial rhetoric. It may be wrong, but it doesn't mean you personally have a negative opinion of a certain 'race'. Barry Goldwater voted against a civil rights bill, but how was Clinton to know he'd do that?
3) Not any more than Clinton does.
4) Are you serious? A red herring? You said Hillary is bad because she is funded by the banks, and I pointed out Obama was funded more by the banks than she was in 2008. Obama and Clinton both support Dodd-Frank, but that doesn't matter. You said that Hillary is bad because she is funded by the banks. If you think that, then you must concede Obama is worse in that respect.
5) It doesn't matter. He broke his promises and made the problem worse.
1) Oh yes his old friend the rapist Bill Clinton.
2) Then I suppose Mr. Trump is not racist. Goldwater was endorsed by the KKK, just like Clinton and Trump.
3) Here is Obama: http://nteb.mudflowermedia.netdna-cdn.c ... -quote.jpg
Here is Hitlery: americablog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Secretary_Clinton_Meets_With_Israeli_Prime_Minister_Netanyahu_4990901618.jpg
4) Okay, I concede, you are not a red herring, but your facts are still mistaken.
5) Obama freed them from the prisons today
EquALLity, you need to focus on discrediting Jill Stein. Trump is doing a perfectly fine job of discrediting himself; if you don't want him in the White House, Stein is your target because her stealing enough votes from Hillary is probably his only chance of winning. Third parties will probably do more in this race than any race in history. Johnson will probably take votes more equally from the two, so he's probably less of an issue (even though he's polling better).
You have to show liberals that Stein is worse than Trump, and that Hillary isn't as bad as they think, so they'll vote Hillary to keep Trump out of office.
EquALLity wrote:The rapist Bill Clinton... I give up. >.<
I am not saying he is the rapist because I do not know enough about this topic. All I am saying is that Trump thinks he is a rapist, so why would he invite him to his wedding?
brimstoneSalad wrote:EquALLity, you need to focus on discrediting Jill Stein. Trump is doing a perfectly fine job of discrediting himself; if you don't want him in the White House, Stein is your target because her stealing enough votes from Hillary is probably his only chance of winning. Third parties will probably do more in this race than any race in history. Johnson will probably take votes more equally from the two, so he's probably less of an issue (even though he's polling better).
You have to show liberals that Stein is worse than Trump, and that Hillary isn't as bad as they think, so they'll vote Hillary to keep Trump out of office.
I think the reason that EquALLity is not discrediting Jill Stein because it is impossible to discredit her because she is lovely.
Obama got more money from Wall Street than Hillary Clinton in 2008. It's bad that she's funded by the banks, but not any more bad than it was for Obama to be, who you apparently love.
