Philosophical Vegan Forum

Like I said, do it if you're curious and want to enough to spend 30 minutes of your day on it.

IQ is not very hard to guess with that margin of error, except for in people with very poor English skill (or low skill in whatever language you're communicating in, or if you have low skill in the language). The way a person writes is a pretty good indication, the way a person comprehends what you're saying and engages is an even better one.

brimstoneSalad wrote:Trump already challenged somebody to an IQ test. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36299929
I question whether he would have done this if he didn't already know his IQ was high.

He probably thinks his IQ is high. Are you familiar with the "better than average" phenomenon? Nearly all people think they are smarter than average. Either way, this is just another example of Trump bullying. He knew Khan would never take on the challenge and if he did Trump would come up with some lame ass excuse to protect himself from humiliation.

Jebus wrote:How would you deal with Trump if you were running against him for the U.S. presidency. Usually name calling is considered immature and not presidential but in this case I think it would be a smart thing to do.

I think it will be crucial how she chooses to talk about Islam and terrorism. Right now people seem to favor Hillary on most issues, except things like Islam. If she continues to be so politically correct and cringeworthy on that issue, it could maybe cost her the election. The funny thing about Obama and Hillary have a very deep understanding of the problems with terrorism, the Middle East and Islam, but they have chosen this weird approach that makes the public think Trump is more knowledgable on the topic when in reality he knows extremely little about the problems.