Morality > Truth?

General philosophy message board for Discussion and debate on other philosophical issues not directly related to veganism. Metaphysics, religion, theist vs. atheist debates, politics, general science discussion, etc.
Cirion Spellbinder
Master of the Forum
Posts: 1008
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 10:28 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Presumably somewhere

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by Cirion Spellbinder »

RedAppleGP wrote:Brimstone, you're saying that the anime dork is being a useless, unproductive slob, which I fully concur with. But you gotta remember she's a teenager. Teenagers rank as some of the least productive people on the planet.
Do you think setting the bar is useful? Consider the golem effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem_effect
RedAppleGP wrote:As for the nihilism, I'm convinced it's a phase, or just hormones.
Why? Personal experience, I presume?
RedAppleGP wrote:She's not in the real world yet (as I am), so when she does get out there, that's where she's gotta be productive.
Do you mean she's delusional or have you set some arbitrary bar to designate where the real world starts (ex: employment, age 18)?
RedAppleGP wrote:But if she kills herself, that eliminates the possibility of of her ever being able to accomplish something productive. Wouldn't that be counterproductive?
Her potential to do good doesn't say anything about her likeliness to do good.

Setting an orphanage ablaze has potential to do good. Maybe I'll kill an employee who was raping the children and everyone else will be safe! This of course isn't the likely result.
RedAppleGP wrote:Who knows, maybe as she matures and grows up, she'll be the one advocating morality.
How likely is this to happen?
RedAppleGP wrote:I mean, she's still just a kid, she still has a lot of time to accomplish things. I think we should offer a more productive solution, don't you think?
Any ideas? ;)
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10370
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by brimstoneSalad »

EquALLity wrote: Nobody is 'broken beyond repair'. Everybody is redeemable, because everyone can change.
It's called being totaled. A car can always be fixed, but sometimes the cost to do so is more than scrapping it and buying a new car.
See what Cirion Spellbinder said above this post.

As to the little girl who was fixed: That was done by intense therapy. She was a minor, and was subjected to it to fix her problems. T6M is unwilling to change; both arrogant and complacent, she doesn't care about being a good person as she has made repeatedly clear.

If somebody wants to change, I'm 100% behind that. Where there's a will, there's probably a way.
T6M is committed to being a worthless piece of hedonistic shit, though -- being amoral is part of her identity, like a rabid randroid.
EquALLity wrote: She said some bad things, but the callous way you're talking to T6M while recommending ways for T6M to commit suicide is also pretty nasty.
I recommended no methods.

I didn't even tell her to do it. It's her choice. I said if she wants to, and discussed the relative value of the action.
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10370
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by brimstoneSalad »

Catch 22: You can get out of flight duty if you're crazy, but anybody who applies to be relieved of duty is showing a rational concern for personal safety, and is thus not crazy.

You're begging the question in your claims about depression. This is why I told you to keep an open mind: defining a person who is 'depressed' as inherently irrational is not open minded or rational. The ability of many people who are unhappy with their lives to use reason is clearly demonstrable.
(We're talking about subjective qualia here, not empirical data like effects on the environment. Apples and oranges. But factory farming is probably better for the environment than free range organic farming.)

You are saying you know their minds better than they do, but depression isn't always a delusion or chemical imbalance; a diagnosis can come from something as simple as being unhappy and just sincerely not wanting to live, with no shortage if information or rational thought.

Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYemnKEKx0c
You're doing what the psychiatrists are doing in his anecdote.

Psychiatry, unlike experimental psychology, is unfortunately a very soft science, and unfortunately too often based on bias and cherry picking rather than objective evidence. I'm not saying it's worthless, it's important to TRY medication if you are depressed so you know if it helps you and if you want to take it, but just because somebody is depressed does not mean he or she is incapable of rational thought and making decisions for his or herself.
We need to recognize and be open to the idea that some people do not have the same interest in living that we do, and wherever that comes from, we need to have some respect that rather than trying to blindly impose our own over theirs.
It may be better in the end to inspire an interest in living in these people, but that's aside from the point that suicide can be rational.

A person who is unhappy with life, is aware of the options, understands that he or she isn't going to paradise, and prefers death (no experience) to the other alternatives can make a rational decision to end his or her life.
EquALLity wrote: What good do you think is going to come out of this? Do you think you're going to convince T6M to be a good person by saying things like that? Aren't you trying to teach compassion? WTF?
What good? It's unlikely any good will ever come out of her.

She hasn't listened to people being nice. She hasn't even listened to the answer to her question here: she just declared it off topic and ran away rather than defend her claims.

She does not value truth, because she has no access to it -- she is not omniscient. Her theist friends are wrong about their theism, but they are right about her: She is a hypocrite, and fully irrational in her supposed "values", which are really just another dogma.

Will she consider a more assertive message? Probably not.
But she's being a little brat, and she needs to put up or shut up.

She's complaining about the world being so terrible that she doesn't want to be in it, but she's part of the problem. She can start being part of the solution, she can stop complaining, or there's an exit available she can take if she can't bother lifting a finger to improve things.
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10370
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by brimstoneSalad »

Cirion answered this pretty well.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:
RedAppleGP wrote:Brimstone, you're saying that the anime dork is being a useless, unproductive slob, which I fully concur with. But you gotta remember she's a teenager. Teenagers rank as some of the least productive people on the planet.
Do you think setting the bar is useful? Consider the golem effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem_effect
Right. I tend to hold people to pretty high standards. I don't treat teenagers with kid gloves. She needs to start acting like an adult, or she shouldn't be on the internet with grown ups.
Every other teenager on this forum is adult enough to take personal responsibility, and metacognitive enough to even reflect on their own biases and values more, which is impressive but also how it should be.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:
RedAppleGP wrote:As for the nihilism, I'm convinced it's a phase, or just hormones.
Why? Personal experience, I presume?
It may be a phase, but I pretty much take people at their words (or try to). If somebody identifies as amoral, I'm inclined to accept that at face value.
She has very vocally rejected the value of morality to her on a number of occasions.

Wouldn't it be worse if I just patronized her and wrote off her behavior as a phase without addressing it like a serious concern?
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:
RedAppleGP wrote:Who knows, maybe as she matures and grows up, she'll be the one advocating morality.
How likely is this to happen?
I tend toward pessimism, so I'd put my odds of winning the lottery higher.
She's going to have to prove me wrong.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:
RedAppleGP wrote:I mean, she's still just a kid, she still has a lot of time to accomplish things. I think we should offer a more productive solution, don't you think?
Any ideas? ;)
I offered up all I had, and even explained how having consistent values and caring about others is good for her psychological well being too.
What else can we say?

If she doesn't want to live in this world and won't just shut up and suck it up, and can't be bothered to make it a better place and fulfill herself in less angsty ways by helping others, seems like the only option left is to leave it.
User avatar
Red
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3983
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:59 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: To the Depths, in Degradation

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by Red »

where was i? oh right
Cirion Spellbinder wrote: Do you think setting the bar is useful? Consider the golem effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem_effect
So wait, what're you implying? Are you implying that teenage unproductiveness is fueled by the golem effect?
Cirion Spellbinder wrote: Why? Personal experience, I presume?
Nope, just an educated guess.

syer

Cirion Spellbinder wrote: Do you mean she's delusional or have you set some arbitrary bar to designate where the real world starts (ex: employment, age 18)?
I kinda meant the former.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote: Her potential to do good doesn't say anything about her likeliness to do good.
Setting an orphanage ablaze has potential to do good. Maybe I'll kill an employee who was raping the children and everyone else will be safe! This of course isn't the likely result.
I thought they were synonyms.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote: How likely is this to happen?
Why are you asking me? Plus, emphasis on the "who knows"
Cirion Spellbinder wrote: Any ideas? ;)
Hm. Not sure.

All I was saying is that she's still young, there's still time to accomplish something. I mean, from what I can tell, society will accept anyone no matter how unproductive they are (so fuck survival of the fittest), so she may squeeze into that category. But I like to give people chances and the benefit of the doubt.
Learning never exhausts the mind.
-Leonardo da Vinci
User avatar
Red
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3983
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:59 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: To the Depths, in Degradation

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by Red »

brimstoneSalad wrote: Wouldn't it be worse if I just patronized her and wrote off her behavior as a phase without addressing it like a serious concern?
Sure, maybe. But I like giving people the benefit of the doubt.
brimstoneSalad wrote:I tend toward pessimism,
well not me

brimstoneSalad wrote:What else can we say?
now that I think about it..
brimstoneSalad wrote:If she doesn't want to live in this world and won't just shut up and suck it up, and can't be bothered to make it a better place and fulfill herself in less angsty ways by helping others, seems like the only option left is to leave it.
Sheeit negro, that's all ya' had to say!
Learning never exhausts the mind.
-Leonardo da Vinci
User avatar
Red
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3983
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:59 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: To the Depths, in Degradation

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by Red »

Cirion Spellbinder wrote: Saying that something is worth trying because it can happen is absurd. Everyone can change, but not everyone is likely to change.

How fixable are these people?
• How much time would it require?
• What resources would we need?
• Would these resources and time be better devoted to other issues?
• How effective is saving these people in terms of effective altruism?
It's worth a shot.


And it may be the only shot we have.
Learning never exhausts the mind.
-Leonardo da Vinci
User avatar
EquALLity
I am God
Posts: 3022
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:31 am
Diet: Vegan
Location: United States of Canada

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by EquALLity »

Cirion Spellbinder wrote:Saying that something is worth trying because it can happen is absurd. Everyone can change, but not everyone is likely to change.
I understand that not everyone is likely to change, but we don't know enough about whether or not she is more likely to change, and we don't have a lot of context in general about this.

Even if she was more likely not to change, I would still lean towards promoting change as opposed to suicide, because I think the result of change is a lot better than the result of suicide.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:How much time would it require?
Enough time to write these responses.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:What resources would we need?
Words are all we have. It's not a great expenditure of resources.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:Would these resources and time be better devoted to other issues?
You tell me. I think this is pretty good.
Cirion Spellbinder wrote:How effective is saving these people in terms of effective altruism?
First of all, not encouraging a person to commit suicide is not 'saving' that person, it's just not trying to harm that person.

And it's a great thing to make a person care about ethics and helping the world.

Also note that, we might not be able to change T6M alone, but we can plant seeds that may germinate with exposure to other things and time.
Telling a person to commit suicide reinforces negativity, and harms our chances of making a person become compassionate.
"I am not a Marxist." -Karl Marx
User avatar
EquALLity
I am God
Posts: 3022
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:31 am
Diet: Vegan
Location: United States of Canada

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by EquALLity »

brimstoneSalad wrote:It's called being totaled. A car can always be fixed, but sometimes the cost to do so is more than scrapping it and buying a new car.
See what Cirion Spellbinder said above this post.
I responded to it.
brimstoneSalad wrote:As to the little girl who was fixed: That was done by intense therapy. She was a minor, and was subjected to it to fix her problems. T6M is unwilling to change; both arrogant and complacent, she doesn't care about being a good person as she has made repeatedly clear.

If somebody wants to change, I'm 100% behind that. Where there's a will, there's probably a way.
T6M is committed to being a worthless piece of hedonistic shit, though -- being amoral is part of her identity, like a rabid randroid.
T6M has indicated caring about being a good person on this topic. I don't think it's enough based on the statement, but it's a start. It's definitely better than before.

For someone who talks about the Golem Effect a lot, it's interesting that you don't think saying a person is 'committed to being a worthless piece of shit' and basically a lost cause will influence T6M to have that mindset and not change as a result.
brimstoneSalad wrote:I recommended no methods.
That's true, but what you said was still pretty bad.
When your argument is, "It's not that bad, I didn't recommend specific ways for the person to commit suicide"... that's not really good.
brimstoneSalad wrote:I didn't even tell her to do it. It's her choice. I said if she wants to, and discussed the relative value of the action.
Yes you did.

"...you're clearly too stupid to keep wasting space on this planet..."
"I am not a Marxist." -Karl Marx
User avatar
Red
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3983
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:59 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: To the Depths, in Degradation

Re: Morality > Truth?

Post by Red »

EquALLity wrote:
brimstoneSalad wrote:I didn't even tell her to do it. It's her choice. I said if she wants to, and discussed the relative value of the action.
Yes you did.

"...you're clearly too stupid to keep wasting space on this planet..."
Brimstone said if she really wants to. Brimstone is not forcing it, and is ultimately leaving the choice up to her. I mean there's kinda a recommendation, but no obligation.

Now thinking about it, the world would be a fuck of a lot better..

Brimstone reminds me of Senator Armstrong.
Learning never exhausts the mind.
-Leonardo da Vinci
Post Reply