brimstoneSalad wrote:It's important to understand that it has no real meaning, and it just makes people angry when you say what they're doing is unfair, because in their views they are being fair.
If there's any real definition of the word fair, being on a team for people new to the club even though you did just as good as people on the best one just because you haven't been going to the club (and it's not like they didn't know I still wanted to participate, I emailed him multiple times) is unfair.
brimstoneSalad wrote:Sounds reasonable.
He's had to bump more people than just you.
Some people haven't been able to join at all.
It's not just bumping, though. I'm not even on team B, and I did just as good as my friend on team A (we literally medaled together). If I was on team B, I wouldn't care that much, though I'd probably feel a bit slighted.
Apparently there was one guy on team A who wanted to go on team B, so he switched, but there was a problem with that and somehow he got put on team C.
It's a total mess.
brimstoneSalad wrote:Sometimes things are first come first serve.
How much time does this take each week?
First come first serve doesn't make sense if the teams are based on skill, and I went to the club at the earlier meetings and emailed him to make sure he knew I was still in the club.
I'm probably still going to do it, I'm just kind of salty about it now.

My friend told me that the teams are actually irrelevant, because the medals are all the same. And even if team A wins as a group (which is more likely than for team B or C to win, because people on team A obviously have more experience generally etc.) and goes to state level, it's not just people on team A who get to go; it's the people who did the best.
That's not completely true, because by being on team C I'll have a less experienced partner, but then I have a really smart friend who is new to the club on team C, and there's a genius freshman I know who's on team C. But still, it's kind of irritating.