Page 1 of 1

isidewith.com RESULTS

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:49 am
by Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Hello. I recommend you all visit a website called isidewith.com because for this website will help you to understand which candidate in the 2016 presidential election you most identify yourself with and what your political ideologies are. Here are my results:
The candidate I side most with is Jill Stein, I agree with her on 93% of the issues.
Then, in condescending order, Hillary Clinton, Gary Johnson, Donald Trump and Darrell Castle.
I am Left-Wing on the Political Compass.
I side strongly towards Environmentalism, as opposed to Anthropocentrism.
I side moderately towards Multilateralism, as opposed to Unilateralism.
I side moderately towards Pacifism, as opposed to Militarism.
I side strongly towards Progressive, as opposed to Traditional.
I side moderately towards Multiculturalism, as opposed to Assimilation.
I side strongly towards Collectivism, as opposed to Individualism,
I side strongly towards Big Government, as opposed to Small Government.
I side strongly towards Tender, as opposed to Tough.
I side strongly towards Socialism, as opposed to Capitalism.
I side moderately towards Centralization, as opposed to Decentralization.
I side moderately towards Protectionism, as opposed to Globalization.
I side moderately towards Keynesian, as opposed to Laissez-faire.
I side moderately towards Regulation, as opposed to Deregulation.
I side moderately towards Security, as opposed to Privacy.
I side moderately towards Populism, as opposed to Elitism.
I am a centrist on Isolationism and Imperialism issues.
Please take the test and tell me what you got.

Re: isidewith.com RESULTS

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 1:07 pm
by EquALLity
This was actually posted about awhile ago:
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=555&p=10383&hilit=isidewith#p10348
I wrote:I found this cool quiz that shows how much you agree with the current American candidates for President! Here are my results:
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016 ... 1136875757

Tell me what you get, and remember to click to show more all of the questions! :D
You don't have to answer all of the questions, btw. It will work with what you answer.

Also: If the site isn't able to determine the stance of a candidate on something, it will say that you disagree.
*Some of my views have changed since I took that quiz.

Re: isidewith.com RESULTS

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 2:07 pm
by Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
EquALLity wrote:This was actually posted about awhile ago:
http://philosophicalvegan.com/viewtopic ... ith#p10348
I wrote:I found this cool quiz that shows how much you agree with the current American candidates for President! Here are my results:
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016 ... 1136875757

Tell me what you get, and remember to click to show more all of the questions! :D
You don't have to answer all of the questions, btw. It will work with what you answer.

Also: If the site isn't able to determine the stance of a candidate on something, it will say that you disagree.
*Some of my views have changed since I took that quiz.
Oh! I am so sorry!

Re: isidewith.com RESULTS

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 2:58 pm
by miniboes
I think it's really weird how nuclear energy is in the 'science' section rather than 'environment' and none of the presidential candidates have a position added for it. I guess this means the answer you give doesn't influence your outcome at all.

Re: isidewith.com RESULTS

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 4:03 pm
by brimstoneSalad
miniboes wrote:I think it's really weird how nuclear energy is in the 'science' section rather than 'environment' and none of the presidential candidates have a position added for it. I guess this means the answer you give doesn't influence your outcome at all.
Yeah, it sounds like that makes the test very nearly useless.

Re: isidewith.com RESULTS

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:10 pm
by EquALLity
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
EquALLity wrote:This was actually posted about awhile ago:
http://philosophicalvegan.com/viewtopic ... ith#p10348
I wrote:I found this cool quiz that shows how much you agree with the current American candidates for President! Here are my results:
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016 ... 1136875757

Tell me what you get, and remember to click to show more all of the questions! :D
You don't have to answer all of the questions, btw. It will work with what you answer.

Also: If the site isn't able to determine the stance of a candidate on something, it will say that you disagree.
*Some of my views have changed since I took that quiz.
Oh! I am so sorry!
No problem, just wanted to let you know so you could see what other peoples' answers were. :)

Interestingly, I agree 98% will Jill Stein, and 94% with Clinton.
I agree 4% with someone named Darrel Castle. o_O

Even though I agree on more issues with Stein, I support Clinton because of how I weigh those issues along with other things like experience.

Interestingly, Stein and Johnson (wow, even Johnson!) are the only candidates who says yes to the question:
Should the government support a separation of church and state by removing references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments?

That's pretty impressive.

Re: isidewith.com RESULTS

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 2:42 am
by Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
EquALLity wrote:
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
EquALLity wrote:This was actually posted about awhile ago:
http://philosophicalvegan.com/viewtopic ... ith#p10348



*Some of my views have changed since I took that quiz.
Oh! I am so sorry!
No problem, just wanted to let you know so you could see what other peoples' answers were. :)

Interestingly, I agree 98% will Jill Stein, and 94% with Clinton.
I agree 4% with someone named Darrel Castle. o_O

Even though I agree on more issues with Stein, I support Clinton because of how I weigh those issues along with other things like experience.

Interestingly, Stein and Johnson (wow, even Johnson!) are the only candidates who says yes to the question:
Should the government support a separation of church and state by removing references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments?

That's pretty impressive.
You see! Hillary is not only a shill for corporations but also for a religion!

Darrel Castle is of the Constitution Party, he is a very socially conservative right-wing man. He ignores that the founding fathers were socialists and secularists.