Creationist Comment I Need Help On

[JadeSpeedster17]

I'm trying to understand these comments he gives me I am interested in what he says. Seeing if it's real. I need some help. HEre is his comments:

"You are being sarcastic.... Or is it being "sardonic"....? Well either way, if you really are interested in science there is ample science out there that debunks evolution.

A great compilation of evolutionists that have contradicted themselves is "That Their Words May Be Used Against Them" Henry Morris.

Look up G. Thomas Sharpe. (Spelling?) His book "Rocks, Fossils and Dinosaurs" is a book that is eye opening to those who desire to know anything about geology and how it is used to debunk "evolutionisms".

Look up Stephen J. Gould and his opinion on the fossil record. He is a RABID evolutionist and he has debunked the "fossil record" where it is used as evidence FOR evolution.

Henry Morris. Any of his books.
Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati, Physical chemist / spectroscopist, author.

Here is a good link that is very informative:

http://www.vedicsciences.net/articles/d ... unked.html

Individuals on this list must possess a doctorate in a science-related field:
Dr Paul Ackerman, Psychologist
Dr E. Theo Agard, Medical Physics
Dr James Allan, Geneticist
Dr Steve Austin, Geologist
Dr S.E. Aw, Biochemist
Dr Thomas Barnes, Physicist
Dr Geoff Barnard, Immunologist
Dr Don Batten, Plant physiologist, tropical fruit expert
Dr John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics
Dr Jerry Bergman, Psychologist
Dr Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology
Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology
Dr Raymond G. Bohlin, Biologist
Dr Markus Blietz, Astrophysicist
Dr Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology
Edward A. Boudreaux, Theoretical Chemistry
Dr David R. Boylan, Chemical Engineer
Prof. Linn E. Carothers, Associate Professor of Statistics
Dr Robert W. Carter, Zoology (Marine Biology and Genetics)
Dr David Catchpoole, Plant Physiologist (read his testimony)
Prof. Sung-Do Cha, Physics
Dr Eugene F. Chaffin, Professor of Physics
Dr Choong-Kuk Chang, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Jeun-Sik Chang, Aeronautical Engineering
Dr Donald Chittick, Physical Chemist
Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education
Dr John M. Cimbala, Mechanical Engineering
Dr Harold Coffin, Palaeontologist
Dr Bob Compton, DVM
Dr Ken Cumming, Biologist
Dr Jack W. Cuozzo, Dentist
Dr William M. Curtis III, Th.D., Th.M., M.S., Aeronautics & Nuclear Physics
Dr Malcolm Cutchins, Aerospace Engineering
Dr Lionel Dahmer, Analytical Chemist
Dr Raymond V. Damadian, M.D., Pioneer of magnetic resonance imaging
Dr Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist
Dr Nancy M. Darrall, Botany
Dr Bryan Dawson, Mathematics
Dr Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry
Prof. Stephen W. Deckard, Assistant Professor of Education
Dr David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience
Dr Don DeYoung, Astronomy, atmospheric physics, M.Div
Dr Geoff Downes, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr Ted Driggers, Operations research
Robert H. Eckel, Medical Research
Dr André Eggen, Geneticist
Prof. Dennis L. Englin, Professor of Geophysics
Prof. Danny Faulkner, Astronomy
Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology
Prof. Dwain L. Ford, Organic Chemistry
Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology
Dr Alan Galbraith, Watershed Science
Dr Paul Giem, Medical Research
Dr Maciej Giertych, Geneticist
Dr Tim Gilmour, Electrical Engineer
Dr Duane Gish, Biochemist
Dr Werner Gitt, Information Scientist
Dr D.B. Gower, Biochemistry
Dr Dianne Grocott, Psychiatrist
Dr Stephen Grocott, Industrial Chemist
Dr Donald Hamann, Food Scientist
Dr Barry Harker, Philosopher
Dr Charles W. Harrison, Applied Physicist, Electromagnetics
Dr John Hartnett, Physicist and Cosmologist
Dr Mark Harwood, Satellite Communications
Dr Joe Havel, Botanist, Silviculturist, Ecophysiologist
Dr George Hawke, Environmental Scientist
Dr Margaret Helder, Science Editor, Botanist
Dr Harold R. Henry, Engineer
Dr Jonathan Henry, Astronomy
Dr Joseph Henson, Entomologist
Dr Robert A. Herrmann, Professor of Mathematics, US Naval Academy
Dr Andrew Hodge, Head of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Service
Dr Kelly Hollowell, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacologist
Dr Ed Holroyd, III, Atmospheric Science
Dr Bob Hosken, Biochemistry
Dr George F. Howe, Botany
Dr Neil Huber, Physical Anthropologist
Dr Russell Humphreys, Physicist
Dr James A. Huggins, Professor and Chair, Department of Biology
Evan Jamieson, Hydrometallurgy
George T. Javor, Biochemistry
Dr Pierre Jerlström, Creationist Molecular Biologist
Dr Arthur Jones, Biology
Dr Jonathan W. Jones, Plastic Surgeon
Dr Raymond Jones, Agricultural Scientist
Dr Felix Konotey-Ahulu, Physician, leading expert on sickle-cell anemia
Prof. Leonid Korochkin, Molecular Biology
Dr Valery Karpounin, Mathematical Sciences, Logics, Formal Logics
Dr Dean Kenyon, Biologist
Prof. Gi-Tai Kim, Biology
Prof. Harriet Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jong-Bai Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Han Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Wook Kim, Environmental Science
Prof. Kyoung-Rai Kim, Analytical Chemistry
Prof. Kyoung-Tai Kim, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Young-Gil Kim, Materials Science
Prof. Young In Kim, Engineering
Dr John W. Klotz, Biologist
Dr Vladimir F. Kondalenko, Cytology/Cell Pathology
Dr Leonid Korochkin, M.D., Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology
Dr John K.G. Kramer, Biochemistry
Prof. Jin-Hyouk Kwon, Physics
Prof. Myung-Sang Kwon, Immunology
Dr John G. Leslie, biochemistry, molecular biology, medicine, biblical archaeology
Prof. Lane P. Lester, Biologist, Genetics
Dr Jason Lisle, Astrophysicist
Dr Alan Love, Chemist
Dr Ian Macreadie, molecular biologist and microbiologist:
Dr John Marcus, Molecular Biologist
Dr George Marshall, Eye Disease Researcher
Dr Ralph Matthews, Radiation Chemist
Dr John McEwan, Chemist
Prof. Andy McIntosh, Combustion theory, aerodynamics
Dr David Menton, Anatomist
Dr Angela Meyer, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr John Meyer, Physiologist
Dr Albert Mills, Reproductive Physiologist, Embryologist
Colin W. Mitchell, Geography
Dr John N. Moore, Science Educator
Dr John W. Moreland, Mechanical engineer and Dentist
Dr Henry M. Morris, Hydrologist
Dr John D. Morris, Geologist
Dr Len Morris, Physiologist
Dr Graeme Mortimer, Geologist
Stanley A. Mumma, Architectural Engineering
Prof. Hee-Choon No, Nuclear Engineering
Dr Eric Norman, Biomedical researcher
Dr David Oderberg, Philosopher
Prof. John Oller, Linguistics
Prof. Chris D. Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biology
Dr John Osgood, Medical Practitioner
Dr David Pace, Organic Chemistry
Dr Charles Pallaghy, Botanist
Dr Gary E. Parker, Biologist, Cognate in Geology (Paleontology)
Dr David Pennington, Plastic Surgeon
Prof. Richard Porter
Dr Georgia Purdom, Molecular Genetics
Dr Albert E. Pye, invertebrate zoology, biotechnology, biological control (1945–2012)
Dr John Rankin, Cosmologist
Dr A.S. Reece, M.D.
Prof. J. Rendle-Short, Pediatrics
Dr Jung-Goo Roe, Biology
Dr David Rosevear, Chemist
Dr Ariel A. Roth, Biology
Dr John Sanford, Geneticist
Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati, Physical chemist / spectroscopist"


He also gave me these to my questions:

////Also Mr. Dare, do you know about G Thomas Sharpe? Do you know when he was around? Did you know he was a preacher also? That he read only Darwin's book on evolution?
On top of that, do you know what a Geologist is?/////

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes. And he is a well educated geologist.
4. No I do not know if he has read Darwin's debunked thesis.
5. Yes.

/////You gave the claim of Stephen J Gould. Do you know what his life was? Do you know what his theory, the punctuated equilibrium,, was? What was said in it? Did you know he thought that science and religion had no conflict in each other? Yet he still thought Evolution to be true?/////

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes.
4. Not sure if I remember reading that about him.
5. Yes, he was a RABID evolutionist.

/////How many fossils have we found Mr Dare? How many have been dated back so many years?/////

I do not know the exact number, no. I know that they have been dated by faulty dating methods that are based upon assumptions not science. The geologic column has been debunked also. So it cannot be used as an evidence for an old earth.

/////How is the DNA so matched up to our common ancestors?/////

No. DNA does not "match" humans with animals. Only in the religion of evolutionism does that happen.

///// How is it everything is related in this world?////

Everything has the exact same Creator. That is how we are related. Humans are not animals we have a common Creator annd not a common ancestor. (Unless of course you consider Adam and Eve.)

/////We have a common ancestor to many, like all animals do, so why is that? Do you know why? ////

No we do not have a common ancestor. Humans are not animals. The only reason that there is a supposed "common ancestor" is because of the religion of evolution. It is one of their religious beliefs. Debunked, but they hold on to it religiously.

/////Why only on Darwin's claims? Did you know that modern scientist do not use Darwin's theory?////

Yes. Because darwin's claims have been debunked like every "evolutionism". Now we have "Neo - Darwinists"

/////It was a bases Mr. Dare, for evolution, did you know this? Or that we have developed beyond what Darwin had in hsi years to make more ideas and find things to back it up?////

And even Stephen J. Gould KNEW that the fossil record was bankrupt of evidence FOR evolutionism. THAT is why he made up his "punctuated equilibrium" hypothesis.

Yes, Darwin is the "ape daddy" of
evolutionism and he is worshipped in your hallowed halls and temples of higher learning. But he has been debunked....shamed and exposed as the fraud that he was.

Guess what? Finches are still just finches, just like when Almighty God created them. Darwin is extremely embarrassed now. He has met his Maker. Hopefully he was just a deceived Christian and not a lost hell bound sinner.


/////Tell me Mr, Dare, you have made these claims to me. I want to know where you got this from? Answer my questions, did you know this, do you know the answers with out a goggle search? Do you know about the claims you make and where they come from? About the people you mention?/////

Yes I know where my claims come from. Yes I know of the people that I have mentioned. No I do not know them personally, but I do know of them. They are well educated in the fields that they worked in. Some were even indoctrinated into evolution and because of the science that they studied and "did" they realized that they were trusting in a lie. They (the answers that I gave you) come from years of researching science and the religion of evolutionism. I have a few science books in my library. They are quite enlightening. Yes, I do a google search when I do not know something or run into something that I am not familiar with. But google searches are not my only source, even though there is much to find when searching the web.


/////Until you give me real credible answers, your claims are only based on what you find on the next creationist website. You claim to know we are wrong, that we are the religion in your eyes. So I want answers to this 'whys' 'hows' and 'dos'/////

If my answers are wrong then why can't you or any evolutionist debunk them? You can't. And you know it.


My answers are not found only on creationist web sites. They can be found by discussing the religion of evolution with evolutionists, reading numerous books and looking at the created world around me.


My relationship with the Creator is also something that helps me reject the silly but dangerous heresies of evolutionism. Many evolutionisms have been debunked by science which in turn relegates that religion to the debunked file."



I know it's a lot, I'll answer questions about him, but are these people he gives credible?
Are they real Dr's and people who study this and also.
I was being sarcastic at first, but then I got to thinking about his answers. So Is this guy right with his sources? I would search it all up, but it's a lot so I wanted to ask for help on this.

Thank you all

[brimstoneSalad]

Hi,

Here is an index of creationist claims and their answers:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/
Here's the complete list: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

Every general claim I have ever found is indexed there.
If you find any claims he has made that aren't listed there, please let me know and I can debunk them.

Look up G. Thomas Sharpe. (Spelling?) His book "Rocks, Fossils and Dinosaurs" is a book that is eye opening to those who desire to know anything about geology and how it is used to debunk "evolutionisms".

Sharpe is insane
http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2014/07/1133-g-thomas-sharp.html
And he knows nothing about fossils or dinosaurs:
https://johnnykaje.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/day-one-ish-of-the-big-silly-jesus-circus-lies-about-dinosaurs/
Or he's just a compulsive money grubbing liar (but he lies for Jesus).

Extraordinary claims (like that there's a massive conspiracy in science to defraud the public) require extraordinary evidence.
It's unreasonable and lazy to just give a name of a book and say "there's the proof". If he has an argument to make, he should make it.

On the other hand, knowledge and evidence of evolution is contained in any university level biology book. It's not unreasonable to expect somebody to have basic knowledge of evolution before discussing it. Creationists are inherently ignorant of evolution, and don't properly understand the science they're trying to negate. It's like trying to argue about calculus with somebody who doesn't understand the basic operators plus and minus.

Here's a good concise reference:
https://www.amazon.com/Why-Evolution-True-Jerry-Coyne/dp/0143116649
Why Evolution Is True by Jerry A. Coyne

Look up Stephen J. Gould and his opinion on the fossil record. He is a RABID evolutionist and he has debunked the "fossil record" where it is used as evidence FOR evolution.

This is just a lie.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/part3.html

Creationists love to quote mine, take things out of context, and twist the words of biologists.

Henry Morris. Any of his books.

A Quack. An engineer, not a biologist or anything approaching it, and a Biblical Christian born in 1918. He was a peddler of pseudoscience all his life and founded the pseudoscience of creationism.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Henry_M._Morris

Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati, Physical chemist / spectroscopist, author.

Another non-scientist who happened to pay for a degree somewhere he doesn't use.

http://creationistidiocy.blogspot.com/2009/03/moron-of-month-jonathan-sarfati.html

Apparently the only reason he went to school to get the degree is to give himself false credibility in his apologetics. He's not a chemist or anything else of note, he's an apologist and runs a Biblical creationist organization.

If you have a religious agenda, it's not that hard to go to school for something like chemistry for a few years, avoid biology as much as possible, and scrape by to graduate, then flaunt the claim that you're a "scientist" constantly despite being nothing of the sort.

Step 1: Have no ethics
Step 2: Get an unrelated degree in some science field that you will never use
Step 3: Preach Creationism, sell books, constantly claiming to be a scientist so you can charge a premium
Profit!

Here is a good link that is very informative:

vedicsciences.net/articles/darwin-debunked.html

Pseudoscience nonsense. If somebody wants to make an argument against evolution, he or she should make it, not link to some shitty religious website and expect people to go there to be convinced.
Every claim on that site is likely already covered in the index of creationist claims.

Individuals on this list must possess a doctorate in a science-related field:

That's a terrible list, useless as an appeal to authority against overwhelming consensus (I don't know where it came from). It's listing a very small number of scientists and engineers most of whom were likely tricked into signing a vague statement (true to form for most of these lists). The statement is usually something like:

"I am skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."

Which really does not say they disagree with evolution. It just says they're skeptical and examination of the evidence should be encouraged; scientists would say the same thing about gravity, or anything else. That may not be the source of this list, but usually is.

Here's an actual good link:

https://ncse.com/project-steve

And, again, talk origins covers this:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/steve/

I do not know the exact number, no. I know that they have been dated by faulty dating methods that are based upon assumptions not science. The geologic column has been debunked also. So it cannot be used as an evidence for an old earth.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html#CD
Read those.
Dating processes are very rigorous, it's a widely propagated lie in creationist circles that they're not science (it's the claim they always make when science disagrees with their bible).

No. DNA does not "match" humans with animals. Only in the religion of evolutionism does that happen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi8FfMBYCkk
Watch Ken Miller on this issue (he's a Catholic Biologist).

I know it's a lot, I'll answer questions about him, but are these people he gives credible?

No, they're all quacks. Some of them delusional, some of them intentionally lying (for cash or for Jesus).

Are they real Dr's and people who study this and also.

A small number of them graduated with degrees unrelated to biology and evolution. They might as well be plumbers.
Doesn't stop them from being quacks, though. Even scientists can be crazy sometimes; whether from mental illness, or by just lying to make money (here's a challenge: find one that isn't rich from selling books and seminars). There's big money in creationism, because Christians will pay out the ass to be told by a "scientist" that the Bible is the word or God.


If you want to debate these people, you're better off using street epistemology.

https://streetepistemology.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/magnabosco210

Get at the real reason they believe: it isn't evidence. You do this by asking a hypothetical. Watch some of Anthony's videos.

[JadeSpeedster17]

Ah, that makes much more sense. Thanks. Between school and work at home getting ready for family reunion I had a lot to do. Didn't really have time to read all this only debunk a few claims. So thanks for the links and info, it helps a lot.