A dumb idea I had as a smaller child about human experimentation
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 11:35 pm
I just remembered a memory from my younger self (not that I am old) about human experimentation. I thought that, in the same way that people can become “brain dead” from serious injury, a more open minded future might be able to engineer people without cognition, but still capable of bodily function. This way, unethical experiments could be performed on them instead of animals, which would be beneficial from both an ethical and scientific standpoint.
Now that I think about it now I have some issues and speculations about the idea. For example, I imagine they would have the metabolism (and perhaps other bodily symptoms) of comatose people, which probably wouldn’t translate well with a lot of drugs or nutritional studies. I also have an inclibation that the idea is either impossible to get past a research ethics board or ludicrously expensive. However, I can also see how it would be useful for nutritional studies, because it would be possible to control for far more factors.
What are your thoughts?
Now that I think about it now I have some issues and speculations about the idea. For example, I imagine they would have the metabolism (and perhaps other bodily symptoms) of comatose people, which probably wouldn’t translate well with a lot of drugs or nutritional studies. I also have an inclibation that the idea is either impossible to get past a research ethics board or ludicrously expensive. However, I can also see how it would be useful for nutritional studies, because it would be possible to control for far more factors.
What are your thoughts?