General philosophy message board for Discussion and debate on other philosophical issues not directly related to veganism. Metaphysics, religion, theist vs. atheist debates, politics, general science discussion, etc.
Heeey. This topic is to post screenshots of comments from youtube.
I'm going to be posting things that I find funny,ridiculous, true, or deep and dark.
Please feel free to comment on my screenshots, post your own, go into detail about them, or correct me on what I say.
For my first youtube comment that I found [/color]so true was a discussion about disease and god being the creator of all things (including these diseases).
On one of Jaclyn's videos.
This was the start of a 500 reply uproar:
There were numerous repeated replies from Christian viewers.
As I was skimming through things like this.
I found my most favorite ball buster. That got a good amount of likes.
He's talking about God's abilities to be a omniscient(all seeing eye).
Those of you who read the bible on occasion just like this forum's creator,
then you'll find out what I'm talking about. Anyway here it is:
There wasn't much replies to this... or at least I didn't see any.
But the thing about it. Based on what the bible says, it's so true.
I'm not going to believe, praise, or give thanks to anything that devious.
Sounds more like a greedy king who has slaves and is bored.
That's my feeling towards god. In any form.
Not something worth believing...
Last edited by Ramonen on Sun Nov 30, 2014 3:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
[quote=
I'm going to be posting things that I find funny, ridiculous, true, or deep and dark.
[/quote]
Seems like a pretty reasonable comment to me.
Your writing style and choice of fonts is certainly different, but doesn't bother me at all.
How to become vegan in 4.5 hours:
1.Watch Forks over Knives (Health)
2.Watch Cowspiracy (Environment)
3. Watch Earthlings (Ethics)
Congratulations, unless you are a complete idiot you are now a vegan.
Well, you could prepare your food with a hammer to get the most use out of the hammer, but perhaps it is not very wise. What I'm trying to say is that these tools are to be used with discretion. It is not very pleasant to read a text with all kinds of different sizes and colors, especially if you get into longer posts. I like your enthusiasm though
"I advocate infinite effort on behalf of very finite goals, for example correcting this guy's grammar."
- David Frum
miniboes wrote:The problem of evil is my favorite argument against god, it is incredibly strong on all grounds and never seems to fail. Love it.
Except for the fact that it doesn't disprove all gods. Only the omnipotent, omniscient AND omnibenevolent gods. Theistic religions like to think they have a god with all those properties, but that idea is simply incoherent and impossible.
Disproving the existence of all gods (or the possibility thereof) is a very hard thing to do—if not impossible, since the definition of what god (or gods) is supposed to be does not have any clear boundaries. (see brimstoneSalad's thread here)
miniboes wrote:The problem of evil is my favorite argument against god, it is incredibly strong on all grounds and never seems to fail. Love it.
Except for the fact that it doesn't disprove all gods. Only the omnipotent, omniscient AND omnibenevolent gods. Theistic religions like to think they have a god with all those properties, but that idea is simply incoherent and impossible.
Disproving the existence of all gods (or the possibility thereof) is a very hard thing to do—if not impossible, since the definition of what god (or gods) is supposed to be does not have any clear boundaries. (see brimstoneSalad's thread here)
I am aware, but since I have never actually countered any religious people other than Muslims, Christians and Jews, I am not very concerned about other gods. For other religions I would just need to ask what they believe and why, then reason from there and probably come to the conclusion there is no sufficient evidence to hold that belief.
"I advocate infinite effort on behalf of very finite goals, for example correcting this guy's grammar."
- David Frum
miniboes wrote:I am aware, but since I have never actually countered any religious people other than Muslims, Christians and Jews, I am not very concerned about other gods. For other religions I would just need to ask what they believe and why, then reason from there and probably come to the conclusion there is no sufficient evidence to hold that belief.
Okay, then I understand your generalization. I actually do think the distinction is important, both to know your limits of what you can and cannot disprove/know, and to establish a solid position for yourself. For me, it's not only that I care about other people holding irrational beliefs, but also whether there actually is a god or not (I'm not implying that you don't).
