Philosophical Vegan Forum

What would you rank on the Dawkins' scale? I would between a 6 and a 7.

There ya go.

I am most definitely a 6.

I always prefer to make a distinction between theism and deism. Theism generally makes contradictory claims where we actually have empirical data that says the opposite. Deism is a position that at this time doesn't have a method of verification or falsification, which makes it more complex to speak against (although deism is pretty much only obtained by an argument from ignorance).

So I would say:
Very close to 7 for theism (since 100% doesn't exist).
And a 6 for deism—it seems very improbable on philosophical grounds.

id say 6

because there is empirical evidence against a theist god, witch is what this scale is referring to I would have to place myself as 6.75. the question is dam near seaming nonsensical to me.

This question is unanswerable, because "god" is undefined.

If you're talking about the god of classical theism, omni-everything, based on scripture called infallible, then 7.

Where would you place yourself if the question was whether you think that reality is actually a computer simulation? There can arguably be made a more reasonable case than a case for an eternal God.

Volenta wrote:Where would you place yourself if the question was whether you think that reality is actually a computer simulation? There can arguably be made a more reasonable case than a case for an eternal God.

In that case, 6 seems fine.

6 for me

Volenta wrote:Where would you place yourself if the question was whether you think that reality is actually a computer simulation? There can arguably be made a more reasonable case than a case for an eternal God.

6 too. I don't think I will ever get to 7 on anything.